Nabucco versus South Stream

Dear Colleagues, Dear Energy Professional,
It is your writer’s sincere feeling that we have to re-evaluate Nabucco pipeline project all alone once again. Nabucco is a long term global project to cover periods of generations. Nabucco will deliver gas from the Caspian region to markets in Europe.
On 6th July 2009, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said “Azerbaijan does not plan to initiate or finance construction of the Nabucco pipeline but is ready to provide gas for shipment on the pipeline depending on the commercial terms” to InterFax News Agency.
"If the Nabucco pipeline is built and the commercial terms are good, we will definitely use it. But we will not initiate the process or finance it," Aliyev said on the television program News on Saturday with Sergei Brilev.
Aliyev recalled that Azerbaijan wasn't even considered a gas exporter when the Nabucco pipeline project was first conceived. But its rising production has since attracted interest.
"Naturally we are interested in seeing our gas potential fully realized. But we have already created our gas infrastructure: part was left over from the Soviet era in the form of a pipeline linking us with Russia and part was built. Therefore we have no need to invest in construction of new gas pipelines," he said.
But Azerbaijan stands to gain if additional gas transportation capacity is built, he said. The president of State Oil Company of the Azerbaijani Republic (SOCAR), Rovnag Abdullayev, told journalists the deal to sell gas to Russia will not hinder implementation of Nabucco.
"This agreement does not contain anything that would limit Azerbaijan's participation in Nabucco. It's an ordinary gas purchase agreement," Abdullayev said.
Russia is just one of the countries with which Azerbaijan cooperates on gas sales, he said. "It's a normal agreement that's beneficial for us," Abdullayev said.
Azerbaijan and Russia signed the agreement on June 28,2009 during President Dmitry Medvedev's working visit to Baku. Under the deal, Azerbaijan will sell 500 million cubic meters of gas to Gazprom, with volumes to be increased subsequently.
At upstream potential gas supplier countries, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Azerbaijan and Egypt should have sufficient infrastructure and necessary financing to feed available surplus naturals gas to Turkey.
That will certainly need sufficient time for political stability in the most volatile region of the world.
Turkey will then pump the available gas first to her domestic consumption after that to Europe from AhiBoz major center.
Today only Azeri SahDeniz gas reserves are available. All other potential reserves are at a far future distance to realise exploitation.
Due to Obama’s unfortunate speech on 24th April, plus our mismanagement of Armenian so-called genocide fear, we had created unnecessary difficulties with our Azeri brothers.
We were having Azeri gas at 120 USD/million cubicmeter whereby Azeris want us to pay in prevailing market figures 240 USD which is more than double of the early price.
However it is still cheaper than the Russian price which is floating at 280-300 USD range as of July 2009.
We should not deceive ourselves, nor mislead our expectations.
Azerbaijan is a different country; they have their own national interests, their own priorities.
Nobody asks Azerbaijan to accept so-called genocide. On the other hand one quarter of Azeri land is occupied by Armenians.
Avaliable Azeri ShahDeniz gas fields are now contracted long term to Russian operators at reasonable prices for reselling at high prices to European markets. New potential ShahDeniz fields are not tapped yet.
ShahDeniz underwater gas fields are also in dispute with Turkmenistan. However with Russian support, Azeris will have sovereignty, practical control over the fields.
Russians are good chess players- They offer Turkey to participate into South Stream gas pipeline in order to please us. That means postponement of Nabucco in realisation. When you look at the BlackSea map, there is no South Stream pipeline passing over Turkey. So Turkey may join the project as sole partner in project finance, or contruction subcontractor for BlackSea underwater passing.
Let us get realistic, and face the hard facts. At this end, we have no capacity to play the game, nor any control over the both projects. Our geographical advantage is bypassed. All we can do is to wait and evaluate the offers.
Whatever agreement we shall sign with downstream consumer countries of Europe is nothing of worth to consider, without having first to secure gas to pump into the pipeline.

We all know that there is no gas secured for the pipeline at this time. Salvation is not in Nabucco, nor in South Stream pipeline.
Salvation is in the local resources.
Your writer sincerely advocates ratification of Kyoto protocol,
more utilization of local coal/ wind/ hydro sources,
more thermal power plants with clean coal technologies
i.e. Circulating Fluid Bed (CFB), Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC),
firing local low quality lignite,
more emphasis on national energy supply security,
more professional education and creation of engineering backbone in nuclear technology,
more green employment in green technology.
Your comments are always welcome
Haluk Direskeneli, Ankara based Energy Analysts


